As a consequence of Labour's collapse at the General Election and the
move towards electing a fresh leader, a serious yet comradely
debate is needed within the Labour Movement on what our future
direction of travel should be - and who can best lead this. Even if
this is unlikely to happen, some of us should try to push for it.
The
Manifesto that we should have been fighting the general election on
should now form a major part of our discussions in relation to our
direction of travel. For
apart from the section on Brexit which arose from an unsatisfactory
attempt to reconcile conflicts inside both the PLP and the wider
movement, it is a very important document. Although as a Manifesto
it should really have honed-in on what could feasibly have been
delivered within the lifetime of the new parliament. Yet it was so
fully directed at overcoming the major strengths of the controls of
capitalism, that many of its proposals would have been undermined by
such very powers within the operations of a mere five year period.
Sidney
Webb in shaping Labour's old Clause 4 and planning earlier socialist
programmes from near the end of the first world war, was so fully aware of the powers of capitalism that he
stressed the need for care and gradualism. He was even depicted as
walking slowly in front of a socialist steamroller holding a red
flag. For when any specific expliotive power of capital is tackled, it
is itself likely to turn to fresh devices that will then further need
to be dealt with - and that slows up the process. We can't just wish
away the powers of Capital. It requires steamroller type persistence and gradually mastering anti-social activities.
Labour's
recent Manifesto should not be seen as something which could ever have been
delivered in the life of a single parliament, but as a general
direction of travel. The
Manifesto did, however, start out on a key item which needs to be a
top priority (before we run out of time) - the need to tackle
climate change via what it called a "Green Industrial
Revolution." On this, the Manifesto covered the key areas of the
economy and energy, transport, environment and animal welfare. It is
a pity that its proposals were not given wider publicity - even by
the Party itself. There was even a case for the Green Party pulling
out of many parliamentary contests and joining in the support of
Labour Candidates on this key matter.
The
other key sections of the Manifesto were on the need to "Rebuild
Our Social Services", how to "Tackle Poverty and
Inequality" and the need for "A New Internationalism".
But as this was a Manifesto for a General Election in which we were
seeking to become a Government for the next five years, it was not
something we could democratically have fully hoped to deliver in that
period. Yet there were few references in the Manifesto to time restraints. Apart from a
time qualification which was made in saying that ''Labour will deliver free
full-fibre broadband by 2030" and not by the likely next election in 2025.
There were, however times, when the Manifesto went over the top in its claims. Such as - "We will adopt an ambitious Vision Zero approach to UK road safety, striving for zero deaths and serious injuries". Well that is not going to happen as long as we have road transport - although actions could significantly reduce such killings and injuries.
There were, however times, when the Manifesto went over the top in its claims. Such as - "We will adopt an ambitious Vision Zero approach to UK road safety, striving for zero deaths and serious injuries". Well that is not going to happen as long as we have road transport - although actions could significantly reduce such killings and injuries.
Then
the section sub-headed "Ministry for Employment Rights"
contains the need for no less than 30 key items. It is difficult to
see these getting onto the statute books within a five year period -
unless we adopt a Militant-style Enabling Act. Which is more a revolutionary socialist technique than a democratic socialist approach.
Yet
the direction of travel in the Manifesto (except over the matter of
Brexit which is now mainly outside of Labour's control) is something which
we fully need to press for. Which candidate for the Labour leadership will
now see that this is the type of approach (given a sensitive form of gradualism) that needs to be
retained as a basis for its agenda?